Legislation Details

File #: 26-0652    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Public Hearing (Public & Legislative) Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/24/2026 In control: Zoning Commission
On agenda: 10/13/2026 Final action:
Title: A26-46: A variance at 333 Rhew St (0418275618000) to reduce the rear setback from 30 feet to 18 feet owned by Juliana Baltazar Orocio.
Attachments: 1. Application.pdf, 2. A26-46 Aerial Notification Map.pdf, 3. A26-46 Zoning Map.pdf, 4. A26-46 Future Land Use Map.pdf, 5. A26-46 Subject Property.pdf, 6. A26-46 Surrounding Properties.pdf, 7. 333 Rhew St.pdf
TO: Zoning Commission

THRU: Jennifer Baptiste, CZO – Planning & Zoning Division Manager

FROM: Thomas Cohen – Planner I

DATE: October 13, 2026

RE:Title
A26-46: A variance at 333 Rhew St (0418275618000) to reduce the rear setback from 30 feet to 18 feet owned by Juliana Baltazar Orocio.
Title
end
end
COUNCIL DISTRICT(S):
Council District(s)
9 – Council Member Deno Hondros


b
Relationship To Strategic Plan:
Goal 2: Economic & Strategic Growth
Objective 2.8: To revitalize neighborhoods with effective code enforcement and violations abatement
Goal 3: Desirable Place to Live, Work, & Recreate
Objective 3.5: To ensure a place for people to live in great neighborhoods

Executive Summary:
The applicant is requesting a variance to the rear setback standards found in UDO Section 30-3.D.5 Mixed Residential 5 (MR-5) Zoning District to decrease the required setback from 30 feet to 18 feet. This would enable the completed application of an after-the-fact building permit to resolve Code Enforcement Case CE20260522-06241 for the unpermitted construction of a deck attached to the rear of the home.

Background:
Owner: Juliana Baltazar Orocio
Request: Reduce rear setback from 30 feet to 18 feet
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 0418275618000
Parcel Size: ± 0.09
Existing Site Conditions: Single-family home and shed
Immediate Context: Single-family homes and a vacant forest
Public Notice: Notification letters were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the subject site equating to 21 notices sent.
Related Cases: CE20260522-06241

Issues/Analysis:
Variance Criteria
In accordance with NCGS § 160D-705(d) and UDO Section 30-2.C.14.f five standards must all be met for a variance to be granted.
Unnecessary hardship – Strict application of the Ordinance requirements results in practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships; it shall not be necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of the variance, no reasonable use can be made of the property; and
Pe...

Click here for full text