Legislation Details

File #: 26-0381    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Public Hearing (Public & Legislative) Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/2/2026 In control: Zoning Commission
On agenda: 6/9/2026 Final action:
Title: A26-23 - Variance A request by James Smith of J H Smith Investments for a variance to the fence height standards (Section 30-5.D.4.a) to allow for a taller fence for security purposes at 1651 Cedar Creek Road (0446815034000).
Attachments: 1. Application.pdf, 2. Aerial Notification Map.png, 3. Zoning Map.png, 4. Future Land Use Map.png, 5. Subject Property.pdf, 6. Surrounding Properties.pdf, 7. 1651 Cedar Creek Rd.pdf
TO: Zoning Commission

THRU: Jennifer C. Baptiste - Planning & Zoning Division Manager

FROM: Craig Harmon, CZO - Senior Planner

DATE: June 9, 2026

RE:Title
A26-23 - Variance
A request by James Smith of J H Smith Investments for a variance to the fence height standards (Section 30-5.D.4.a) to allow for a taller fence for security purposes at 1651 Cedar Creek Road (0446815034000).
Title
end
end
COUNCIL DISTRICT(S):
Council District(s)
2 - Malik Davis


b
Relationship To Strategic Plan:
Goal I: Safe and secure community
* 1.3 - To ensure low incidence of property and violent crime
A properly erected security fence of appropriate height to match the existing security fencing will better enable thief and trespasser deterrence.

Goal II: Responsive city government supporting a diverse and viable economy
* 2.4 - To sustain a favorable development climate to encourage business growth
A proper security fence will enable the expansion and redesign of a local commercial enterprise.

Goal III: City investment in today and tomorrow
* 3.2 - To manage the City's future growth and strategic land use
A properly heighted security fence will enable the parcel to be used for the commercial venture without requiring additional land or significant land redevelopment.

Executive Summary:
Request
The applicant requests a variance to UDO Table 30-5.D.4 to increase the maximum fence (including chain link) height within the side and front yards from 4 feet to 6 feet; an increase of 2 feet.

Zoning Commission Decision Point
The Zoning Commission acting in accordance with NCGS ? 160D-705(d) and UDO Section 30-2.C.14.e.2 must decide a course of action:
* Approve the variance request as submitted
* Approve the variance request with conditions
* Deny the variance request

Variance Criteria
1. Unnecessary Hardship
2. Peculiar Conditions
3. Minimum Action Necessary
4. Spirit of the Law
5. Public Safety

Background:
Owner: James Smith; Monica Smith
Request: Increase maximu...

Click here for full text