City of Fayetteville
File #: 24-4272    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Staff Reports Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/8/2024 In control: City Council Regular Meeting
On agenda: 10/14/2024 Final action:
Title: Recreation District Cost Allocation & Funding
Attachments: 1. NC-CI Fayetteville FY23 - CAP Draft, 2. Amendment to Operations Agreement with Cumberland County DRAFT, 3. Recreation Indirect Costs_10-08-2024v4, 4. Parks and Rec Operations Agreement Red Line version
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council

THRU: Adam Lindsay, Assistant City Manager

FROM: Michael Gibson, Parks, Recreation and Maintenance Director

DATE: October 14, 2024

RE:
Title
Recreation District Cost Allocation & Funding
end

COUNCIL DISTRICT(S):
Council District(s)
All


b
Relationship To Strategic Plan:
Goal IV: Desirable Place to Live, Work and Recreate


Executive Summary:
The City and County are working towards an amendment to the 2004 Operating Agreement that led to the formation of the very successful consolidated City of Fayetteville and Cumberland County parks and recreations department. The principal reason for the City requesting a change is related to the $60,000 indirect cost that the County pays to the City, per the agreement. Because that charge has not kept up with inflation and other cost increases, the City and County are working out a new method that both elected bodies will need to approve.


Background:
Recreation services were consolidated in the City of Fayetteville and Cumberland County's Recreation District in 2004. The "recreation district" refers to those areas within the county of Cumberland that contribute their recreation tax to consolidated services. At the time of consolidation, the City and County entered into two agreements: an Interlocal Agreement and an Operation Contract. The Interlocal Agreement dictated the terms of the consolidation, to include the transfer of employees from the County to the City. The Operations Agreement defined responsibilities moving forward, to include the financial responsibility of $60,000 to be paid annually from the County to the City for indirect administrative costs. That amount has remained unchanged for 20 years and is being evaluated.

Indirect cost allocation involves distributing shared administrative expenses (like HR, IT, or finance) to various departments or programs that benefit from these services. Since these costs can't be directly linked to a single departm...

Click here for full text