City of Fayetteville
File #: 22-2933    Version: 1 Name: TA22-04
Type: Public Hearing (Public & Legislative) Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 8/31/2022 In control: City Council Regular Meeting
On agenda: 9/26/2022 Final action:
Title: TA22-04: Proposed Text Amendments to amend Sections 30-2.A, 30.2.B, and 30.2.C of the Unified Development Ordinance regarding the Special Use Permit process, requested by the City of Fayetteville.
Attachments: 1. Ordinance Amending 30-2.7, 2. Ordinance Amending 30-2.A, 3. Ordinance Amending 30-2.B
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council

THRU: Telly C. Whitfield, Ph.D. - Assistant City Manager
Dr. Gerald Newton, AICP - Development Services Director

FROM: Jennifer C. Baptiste, CZO - Planning & Zoning Division Manager

DATE: September 26, 2022

RE:
Title
TA22-04: Proposed Text Amendments to amend Sections 30-2.A, 30.2.B, and 30.2.C of the Unified Development Ordinance regarding the Special Use Permit process, requested by the City of Fayetteville.
end

COUNCIL DISTRICT(S):
Council District(s)
All


b
Relationship To Strategic Plan:
Strategic Operating Plan FY 2021
Goals 2026
Goal 2: Responsible City Government Supporting a Diverse and Viable Economy
* Objective 2.3 - Sustain a favorable development climate to encourage business growth
Goal 3: City Investment in Today and Tomorrow
* Objective 3.2 - Manage the City's future growth and strategic land use
Goal 6: Collaborative Citizen & Business Engagement
* Objective 6.2 - Ensure trust and confidence in City government through transparency and high quality customer service


Executive Summary:
Recommended changes to the process of Special Use Permit (SUP) general standards and clarifying language is presented for the City Council to consider and implement in the City of Fayetteville's Code of Ordinances, Chapter 30 Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). Future changes of how SUPs are used will be presented in a separate, future CCAM.

Background:
The City of Fayetteville has used Special Use Permits since at least 1964 when the city's Zoning Ordinance began folding in some uses that were allowed in a zoning district if they "fit in with the character of the area in which such use is to be located and that such use is not detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood (Ordinance No.1964-10)

Over the years, the standards and North Carolina Statutes continued to allow uses when they met certain standards. North Carolina case law has also created refinements to the way Special Use Permits are handled...

Click here for full text